Atomic physics at storage rings
Within the present research topic we explore the opportunities offered by microscopic liquid jets for
applications at storage rings, both in terms of advanced research infrastructure and as a novel route for the investigation
of so far unexplored light-matter interaction phenomena. One of the scientific caterpillars at the future
Facility for Antiproton and Ion research (FAIR) facility at GSI is
represented by the highly complex internal-target experiments at the High-Energy Storage Ring (HESR). Here, atomic and nuclear
physics experiments foreseen within the SPARC and
PANDA collaborations, respectively, with the latter representing a
state-of-the-art universal detector for antiproton-proton reaction measurements, aim at addressing fundamental issues of
QED and QCD, including atomic structure investigations and key aspects of quark confinement and gluon dynamics. In this regard,
the use of the internal targets provides the highest efficiency in terms of the luminosity, a particularly crucial aspect for
the investigation of processes that are characterized by extremely small cross sections.
State-of-the-art internal targets for storage-ring experiments are realized by producing a cluster beam,
i.e., by expanding a gas through a nozzle into vacuum, yet the typically low-density of cluster gas jets generally precludes
their use for the planned experiments at FAIR. On the other side, the vacuum expansion of a supercritical fluid or even a liquid
is fundamentally different in nature when compared with a gas jet expansion. In particular, the dramatic narrowing of the liquid
beam angular spread occurring upon cooling of the source down into the two-phase supercritical regime, and eventually well into
the liquid phase (click here to read more),
would allow, in turn, adjusting the spatial density over several orders of magnitude at some given distance down stream from the
nozzle due to mass conservation. We have demonstrated this recently at the Experimental Storage Ring (ESR) at GSI
(Kühnel et al., 2009), by improving the
highest area density by orders of magnitude over previous results achieved at the ESR by employing a cluster jet target.
Whereas these results clearly provide a major step towards the goal of achieving higher target densities for
experiments at storage rings, only very little is known about the details of interaction of a relativistic highly charged ion
(HCI) with a dense liquid droplet, especially because energy losses scale with the square of the charge number. In order to
address this fundamental issue, we have recently measured the energy loss of relativistic HCIs during the interaction with a
hydrogen droplet target beam
(Petridis et al., 2011). Figure 1 shows our
experimental results (data points) compared with theoretical predictions (dashed lines) obtained by assuming a hydrogen target
density that is several orders of magnitude smaller than the local droplet liquid density. The fact that the experimental energy
losses are orders of magnitude smaller than expected might at first sight appear surprising. To understand this, we have roughly
estimated the number of HCIs that are involved in direct collisions (per turn) with the droplets and we have found that this
corresponds to a tiny fraction of only 0.01 % of the total number of stored ions. Upon collision with a HCI the droplet likely
disintegrates, producing both neutral and ionized atoms and larger fragments. Since this fragmentation process typically occurs
on the picosecond (10-12 s) time scale, we have argued that the experimentally measured energy losses are primarily dominated
by the in-teraction of the HCIs that are not involved in direct collisions with the nearly spatially uniform target consisting
of the fragmentation products (Petridis
et al., 2011).
|
Figure 1. Experimental (filled symbols) ion energy losses per turn of U91+ at 400 MeV/u (top panel), U91+ at
216 MeV/u (middle), and U89+ at 116 MeV/u (lower panel), measured as a function of the mean hydrogen target area density. The
dashed lines are theoretical results based on the Bethe-Bloch formula.
(From Petridis et al., 2011). |